The National Committee for a Free Europe (NCFE), the parent organization of Radio Free Europe (RFE), began publishing the monthly journal News from Behind the Iron Curtain in January 1952. The description of the journal read:
News from Behind the Iron Curtain, published monthly by the Research and Publication Service of the National Committee for a Free Europe, is distributed in a limited mailing list of those who have expressed in the events and developments in Communist-dominated Europe. This bulletin is a compilation of material collected by the Committee for the use of Radio Free Europe and its other divisions. It is being made available to representatives of the press and other media, universities, churches, libraries, research centers, and other groups who want to know more about "Communism in practice." The publication is not an organ of editorial policy; wherever possible direct questions have been used with a minimum of connective commentary. However, the Committee believes that accurate information contributes to an understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of the Communist system and, hence, to the ability of the free nations to combat this system.
A “Document on Terror” was published in the March 1952 issue of the News from Behind the Iron Curtain. For the next two months, this “document” was excerpted in nationwide newspapers in an article by Associated Press journalist Sigrid Arne. One headline read, “Document Reveals: How Wily Reds Set Foe on Foe.” Another read, “Paper Found on NKVD Man Tells Red Fear Tricks.”
Here are some excerpts from the News from Behind the Iron Curtain Introduction:
The Origin of the Document
The Document on Terror reproduced on the following pages came to the National Committee for a Free Europe from a former Baltic cabinet minister, favorably known to us. This man received the document in 1948 from a Ukrainian refugee in Germany. According to the Ukrainian, the document, printed in Polish, had been found on the body of a dead NKVD officer in Poland in 1948. It was smuggled into Germany, where it was lent to the Ukrainians for 24 hours. During this period, Ukrainians made a shorthand copy of the document, which was later translated into German. The man who lent the document to the Ukrainian has disappeared. All subsequent efforts to find him have failed. The Baltic minister describes the Ukrainian (with whom he had spent several years in a Nazi concentration camp) as “wholly reliable."
The Question of Authenticity
No means of conclusively establishing the authenticity of the Document on Terror is known to us. The NKVD officer is dead, and no irrefutable link between him and the document can "be proved. Specific facts, however, support the belief that the document is a genuine product of Communist theory. First, the trend of thought and method of presentation are typical samples of dialectic materialism. Second, the application of a pattern of terror methods similar to or identical to those described in the monograph did, in fact, occur in widely separated countries in Eastern Europe as well as in China. The theory has been put into practice by the Communists. Third, the integrity of the man who gave it to us is of the highest order.
Translation
The German translation given to the former Baltic minister is all that now remains. Unfortunately, it is incomplete, lacking a title page and ending so abruptly that it seems almost sure that several pages are missing. In addition, the German translation itself is poor. However, it does have the advantage of being a literal translation, even to the extent of following the Polish syntax. The English translation has retained the style of the German except where this would promote misunderstanding. A few apparent inaccuracies have been corrected.
The Reason for Printing
It is not without misgivings that this manuscript is being made available to our readers, since the question of authenticity is by no means resolved. It is our feeling, however, that the document is of such interest and potential importance that it warrants publication. Therefore, we proceed in the hope that the professional scholars and journalists whom this magazine reaches will give it their thoughtful evaluation and draw their own conclusions.
There was a significant problem with this document as some scholars and journalists point to the CIA as the possible originator of the document. For example, Christopher Simpson wrote in his 1998 book Blowback:
The NCFE often distributed the highly publicized-but fraudulent-"Document on Terror," for example, as a means of crystallizing public anger in the West against communism during Radio Free Europe fund-raising campaigns. The "Document" purported to be a translation of a captured Soviet secret police directive encouraging the use of terror against civilian populations. The CIA aggressively promoted the text of the "Document" both directly through RFE and indirectly through coverage planted in a wide variety of sympathetic newspapers, magazines, and television broadcasts to audiences around the world.
The "Document" became a staple of anti-Communist propaganda and continues to show up occasionally in extreme-right-wing publications to this day. Recycled extensively through congressional hearings, Reader's Digest articles, and newspaper accounts, this "captured report" emerged as one of the frequently cited sources of "documentary evidence" of Communist terror during the cold war. It was not until 1956, with the publication of Khrushchev's extraordinary report detailing Stalin's crimes that the "Document" began to fade from view.
Journalist Evan Thomas wrote in The Very Best Men: Four Who Dared: The Early Years of the CIA:
In the early days, the radios were blunt instruments. RFE repeatedly broadcast the "Document on Terror" … There were sections on "general terror"(murders, hangings, etc.), "enlightened terror" (use of agents provocateurs), and "creating the psychosis of white fear." The "captured document" was widely distributed (to the Congressional Record and Reader's Digest, among other places) as proof of what the West was up against. The charges rang true, but the document itself later turned out to be a forgery
Thomas was referring to psychological warfare specialist Paul W. Blackstock’s conclusion in his 1966 book Agents of Deceit: Frauds, forgeries and political intrigue among nations:
Indeed, in addition to the evidence already given, the substantive content of the alleged Document on Terror points to a Western rather than a Soviet or communist origin. Specifically, there are clues to indicate that the author may have been active in one of the Nazi secret police or related terrorist organizations (such as the Sicherheitsdienst or one of the notorious SD or SS "action groups").
The kind of rough ‘content analysis illustrated above should be adequate to indicate that the so-called Document on Terror is probably “fraudulent,” i.e., clearly not what it is represented to be, and is presumably German rather than communist in its inspiration and origin.
Psychiatrist Joost A. M. Meerloo believed the "Document on Terror" to be authentic when he wrote in his book The Rape of the Mind: The Psychiatry of Thought Control, Menticide, and Brainwashing:
Indeed, in addition to the evidence already given, the substantive content of the alleged Document on Terror points to a Western rather than a Soviet or communist origin. Specifically, there are clues to indicate that the author may have been active in one of the Nazi secret police or related terrorist organizations (such as the Sicherheitsdienst, or one of the notorious SD or SS “action groups”) … The kind of rough ‘content analysis illustrated above should be adequate to indicate that the so-called Document on Terror is probably “fraudulent,” i.e., clearly not what it is represented to be, and is presumably German rather than communist in its inspiration and origin.
Terrorism expert David C. Rapoport wrote in the 1982 book The Morality of Terrorism: Religious and Secular Justifications:
The "Document on Terror" is a chilling discussion of two fundamental kinds of terror - "general" and "enlightened" - their organizational bases, particular manifestations, political, psychological, and moral consequences. The author is unknown. Initially, it was described as a manuscript found in 1948 on the body of a dead Soviet official. That account was not entirely persuasive, even to the original publisher, which is probably why the "Document" never attracted much attention.
For the purposes of this volume the precise question of its origin (it may have been written by a Western intelligence officer) is not critical, because the text is a theoretical discussion and should be judged by standards normally applied to such works.
Chapter 9 of the book reproduces the full text of the “Document on Terror”.
Fake News? It needs to be clarified from the record. To repeat the NCFE's reason for printing the document: “We therefore proceed in the hope that the professional scholars and journalists whom this magazine reaches will themselves give it their thoughtful evaluation and draw their own conclusions.”
The illustration above is from the Detroit Free Press newspaper, Sunday, April 20, 1952.






