On September 4, 1951, at 6:30 a.m. local time, the CIA-sponsored station Radio Free Asia began live broadcasting on a test basis from a rented studio in the commercial radio station KNBC, downtown San Francisco (it was 10:30 p.m. in China). After the sound of a bronze gong being struck three times and music from Mahler’s “Song of the Earth,” the first broadcast began with these words in Mandarin Chinese, “This is Radio Free Asia...the voice of free men speaking to the people of Asia.”
The initial news and commentary programs were 90 minutes long and divided into three Mandarin, Cantonese, and English segments. The programs were broadcast via a leased wire RCA short-wave to Manila, Philippines, and from there to China via a directional short-wave antenna.
A September 27, 1951, internal CIA document gave details of the differences between the Voice of America and Radio Free Asia.
There are set forth below certain points of differentiation between the purpose and capabilities of the Voice of America and the purpose and capabilities of Radio Free Asia (RFA). It is believed that these points, while not all suited for inclusion in a formal memorandum to the Department of State, are pertinent to the problem…
Voice of America is the recognized voice abroad of the American Government. Its essential function is to interpret, support, rationalize, and defend American foreign policy. In seeking this objective, it conducts a "Campaign of Truth", a program of worldwide news reporting and analysis which, by presenting world events in their "true" perspective, seeks to influence its audience in support of American foreign policy objectives and the objectives of the Free World. For the same basic purpose, it endeavors also to establish friendship abroad for the American people and appreciation of the democratic and American "way of life."
The point of this paper is, however, that, even at its maximum effectiveness, VOA cannot, as an organ of the American government, contribute all that it is possible for radio to contribute to the psychological warfare mission in the Far East.
The limitations imposed by policy considerations are most clearly exemplified in the attached excerpt relating to the content of South Korean programs. Until the declaration of the U.N. that Communist China had committed aggression in Korea, policy considerations made it impossible for VOA to charge the CCP with aggression. A very potent weapon of propaganda was thus denied to this country while the CCP made headway in laying responsibility on this country for the Korean conflict.
RFA may supplement VOA’S support of American foreign policy objectives in the following ways:
a. It can lend hearing to honest expression of Asian views without tainting them with the stamp of official U.S.. approval, thereby increasing the free exchange of ideas and opinions necessary to healthful sell-government.
b. It can increase Asian acceptance of the "Campaign of Truth" by corroborating the "Truth" through indigenous speakers more readily believed because they are Asian and have a reputation in Asia.
c. It can disseminate news without the strict demands of reliability required by the "Campaign of Truth". (On the whole, it must gain acceptance as a truthful organ, but it can carry "plants" for PW purposes, whereas VOA cannot).
d. Because it is not answerable to the American public and Congress, it can lend hearing to views and opinions which, although in the long-range interest of U.S. policy, are momentarily unpopular at home, which VOA might therefore not be able to air.
e. Because it claims a motivation founded in Asian self-interest, it can appropriately "slant" news commentary in a manner not always appropriate to VOA
f. By giving expression to varied sentiments of varied Asians, it may play on a variety of emotions and attitudes without regard to the consistency expected of an official voice.
g. It may secure outlets, such as government-controlled Radio National Indonesia, now denied VOA by the Indonesian Government, and the innumerable outlets of Formosa, now unused by VOA for U.S. policy reasons.
h. It may engage to a much freer extent than VOA in political warfare
It is believed that the only legitimate objection to RFA would stem from a belief in its impracticality in light of the present Asian listening audience. It may be VOA's view that the current audience in Asia is too small to warrant the effort required of two major radio organizations and that VOA can successfully take care of the small audience that exists.VOA‘s attitude toward the enlargement of its own program, to a very great extent, answers such an objection. It may also be pointed out that VOA is engaged in an effort to expand the listening audience through the development of cheap radios and "drop" radios. RFA may well give effective assistance as the "cover" for the distribution of these devices, particularly in areas behind the Iron Curtain, where they may expand the listening audience of both VOA and RFA.
Over-all Content
In describing events in the Far East, the VOA broadcast to that area pointed out the almost unanimous support given by the U.N. to the action in Korea and the advantages of a free democracy over the regimented body-and-soul controls practiced across the Iron and Bamboo Curtains. The VOA also presented news on the life of Oriental Americans, using editorials and commentaries from the Chinese press in the U.S. as an illustration of the freedom of thought and expression enjoyed by the population in the free world. In general, the picture of life in America and the free democracies has been portrayed in VOA Far Eastern language broadcasts in much the same manner as in broadcasts to Iron Curtain countries.

